nanog mailing list archives
Re: WCCP talk..
From: Jesper Skriver <jesper () skriver dk>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 09:23:25 +0100
On Tue, Nov 10, 1998 at 11:05:00PM -0500, alex () nac net wrote:
That I can accept. But, I still have one fundamental argument, which is to ensure true and absolute reliability, a machine should not be verifying its own health. My other concern is that now that it is licensable, will the other cache manufacturers do it properly also?
Do you have a link or similar that shows that WCCP is now licensable ? Does any know of any other cache manufacturers that currently supports WCCP ? /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver (JS4261-RIPE), Network manager Tele Danmark DataNet, IP section (AS3292) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
Current thread:
- WCCP talk.. alex (Nov 09)
- Re: WCCP talk.. lincoln dale (Nov 09)
- Re: WCCP talk.. alex (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. Craig A. Huegen (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. alex (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. Jesper Skriver (Nov 11)
- RE: WCCP talk.. Christian Kuhtz (Nov 12)
- Re: WCCP talk.. alex (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. lincoln dale (Nov 09)
- Re: WCCP talk.. lincoln dale (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. alex (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. lincoln dale (Nov 10)
- RE: WCCP talk.. Christian Kuhtz (Nov 12)
- RE: WCCP talk.. Christian Kuhtz (Nov 12)
- Re: WCCP talk.. Deepak Jain (Nov 11)
- RE: WCCP talk.. Christian Kuhtz (Nov 12)