nanog mailing list archives
Re: WCCP talk..
From: lincoln dale <ltd () interlink com au>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:44:27 -0800
At 11:04 AM 11/10/98 -0500, alex () nac net wrote:
i believe WCCP is more a heartbeat mechanism - the router will age WCCP 'hello' packets and expire them. presumably if it doesn't hear one of the cache engines 'check in', it'll stop forwarding traffic to it.Your missing what I said. What if the cache continues sending WCCP packets, but the cache itself has died?
i don't think i am -- i would assume that the cache design would perform suitable sanity checks prior to sending out a heartbeat. if the design is sound, the cache would not be capable of sending out WCCP packets if it has 'died' in some way. cheers, lincoln.
Current thread:
- WCCP talk.. alex (Nov 09)
- Re: WCCP talk.. lincoln dale (Nov 09)
- Re: WCCP talk.. alex (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. Craig A. Huegen (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. alex (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. Jesper Skriver (Nov 11)
- RE: WCCP talk.. Christian Kuhtz (Nov 12)
- Re: WCCP talk.. alex (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. lincoln dale (Nov 09)
- Re: WCCP talk.. lincoln dale (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. alex (Nov 10)
- Re: WCCP talk.. lincoln dale (Nov 10)
- RE: WCCP talk.. Christian Kuhtz (Nov 12)
- RE: WCCP talk.. Christian Kuhtz (Nov 12)
- Re: WCCP talk.. Deepak Jain (Nov 11)
- RE: WCCP talk.. Christian Kuhtz (Nov 12)