nanog mailing list archives
Re: ARIN?
From: woods () most weird com (Greg A. Woods)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 18:46:12 -0500 (EST)
[ On Tue, November 10, 1998 at 11:54:32 (-0800), Owen DeLong wrote: ]
Subject: Re: ARIN? I think this misses the point. ARIN doesn't require or want you to SWIP your /30 and /32 allocations. A network that small just doesn't require that level of public contact visibility. As you've pointed out, you'll be doing most of the things that matter (from a contact perspective) for those customers. As such, it makes sense to use your larger block contact information instead of SWIPing such small networks. In fact,
That's not always true. I'd like to see contacts listed at some viable level (in ARIN's whois database if nowhere else) for every autonomous network from which "public" connections might originate, even if it's only a /32. -- Greg A. Woods +1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <gwoods () acm org> <robohack!woods> Planix, Inc. <woods () planix com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods () weird com>
Current thread:
- Re: ARIN?, (continued)
- Re: ARIN? Greg A. Woods (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN? Joseph T. Klein (Nov 11)
- Re: ARIN? Pete Kruckenberg (Nov 11)
- Re: ARIN? Kim Hubbard (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN? Marc Slemko (Nov 09)
- Re: ARIN? Dan Watts (Nov 09)
- Re: ARIN? Kim Hubbard (Nov 10)
- Re: ARIN? Jon Lewis (Nov 08)
- Re: ARIN? Rich Sena (Nov 07)
- Re: ARIN? Andrea Di Lecce (Nov 07)
- Re: ARIN? Kevin Oberman (Nov 07)