nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet
From: Bret McDanel <bret () rehost com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 09:29:55 -0500
---Reply on mail from Peter Stemwedel about FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet
Actually, what the FCC stated was that this tariff was filed properly as the DSL lines are an extension of GTE's inter-LATA frame network. Seems pretty dubious to me, although it's not the whole Internet as long distance thing which I was afraid of at first. Apparently there's to be yet another FCC statement on either access fees or reciprocal comp (I cant remember which but I think it's the latter) by the end of the week. Those RBOCs must have a bunch of lobbyist hanging out at the FCC.
If it is for DSL lines, and if they are ruled to be non local, wouldnt that mean that the rbocs arent required to resell this service to the IXCs (and other ISPs) since the current ruling is for local service (at no less than a 17% discount no less)??? -- Bret McDanel http://www.rehost.com Realistic Technologies, Inc. 973-514-1144 These opinions are mine, and may not be the same as my employer
Current thread:
- FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet Ivars Upatnieks (Nov 03)
- Re: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet Steven J. Sobol (Nov 03)
- Re: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet Peter Stemwedel (Nov 03)
- Re: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet Bret McDanel (Nov 04)
- RE: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet Christian Kuhtz (Nov 08)
- Re: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet John Gonzalez/netMDC admin (Nov 03)
- RE: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet Christian Kuhtz (Nov 08)
- Re: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet Steven J. Sobol (Nov 09)
- Re: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet Peter Stemwedel (Nov 03)
- Re: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet John Curran (Nov 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet MacFarland, Chris (Nov 03)
- Re: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet Steven J. Sobol (Nov 03)
- RE: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet Christian Kuhtz (Nov 08)
- Re: FCC Ruling, Cost of Internet Steven J. Sobol (Nov 03)