nanog mailing list archives

Re: Why does Sprint have address filters again?


From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 09:22:35 -0400 (EDT)

And who pays for the administration of this service?
The government does.
Not the "members".
Do you really want the govt more involved in the Internet?

Why are you drawing parallels when you obviously realize that there are
none to be made?  Insinuation is your specialty so I won't even try it
myself, but as Doug said, you're obviously too intelligent to be making
parallels where there are none, so one does wonder what the motive is.

Avi

Total cost to the ISP to get a SPIN: $0.00

Now, let's look at the parallels:

1.    Both are required to "do business" in a given sector (ie: announce
      routes, sell to the Erate customer base)

2.    Both are simple *technical* providers (assignment of a number, with
      the important being that it is unique in both cases).

3.    One is free to the ISP.

4.    The other costs $500.00


You are either charging a price to defray costs, or you are 
changing a price to encourage/discourage behaviour.  In the 
two cases, the answers to "what is the correct price" are 
radically different, so we need to decide what the goal is 
before determining if the current price is good or bad.

Doug

What is going on here?  ASNs didn't used to cost money until ARIN got its
claws into them.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl () MCS Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/          | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
                           | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax:   [+1 312 803-4929]     | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost




Current thread: