Re: NANOG and the USG Ex-Parte Rules

[Karl Denninger <karl () mcs net>]

NANOG is supposed to be for North American Network Operators - can't the
owner remove posting privileges for Hank (since he meets neither of the 
criteria)?

Take the IAHC-apologist crap elsewhere Hank.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger (karl () MCS Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin
http://www.mcs.net/          | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV
                             | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%!
Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS
Fax:   [+1 312 803-4929]     | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost

On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 08:19:27AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> At 02:04 PM 5/17/98 -0500, Jim Fleming wrote:
>
> NANOG is supposed to be be a "controlled" list - can't the owner remove
> posting privs for Jim?   -Hank
>
> > NANOG is supported by Merit
> >     and Merit is supported by the NSF
> >             and the NSF is supported by the U.S. Government
> >                     and the U.S. Government is supported by U.S. taxpayers...
> >
> > This makes NANOG conversations about Internet Governance
> > topics subject to the Ex-Parte rules of the U.S. Government.
> >
> > I will try to include the right CCs so that the NTIA's web site
> > can be up to date.
> >
> > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/
> >
> >
> > -
> > Jim Fleming
> > Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.net
> > IPv8 - Designed for the Rest of the Human Race
> > AM Radio Stations ---> http://www.DOT.AM