nanog mailing list archives

Re: Core router bakeoff?


From: "Sam Birch" <birchsw () i1 net>
Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 22:24:44 -0500

Not that I've done it, but you can use Kerberos to remotely manage a Cisco,
giving you an encrypted telnet.  In fact, does anyone have any pointers
about how?

Sam

-----Original Message-----
From: Selina Priestley <selina () ans net>
To: perry () piermont com <perry () piermont com>
Cc: John A. Tamplin <jat () traveller com>; Arnaud Girsch
<agirsch () OASysGroup com>; nanog () merit edu <nanog () merit edu>
Date: Friday, May 08, 1998 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: Core router bakeoff?



In short, unless you have numbers to indicate otherwise, I can't say
that PCs cost you much, in the short term or the long term.

What Cisco's will buy you is better handling of T3s, SONET, etc., and
the ability to handle much higher performance lines. They also have
much better remote management facilities, in so far as the things have
real serial consoles and such, which PCs don't.

Perry

One PC remote management win is that you can actually have secure
encrypted access/authentication for remote management, rather than
relying passwords in the clear and tftp.  This is lacking in all
router venders at this instant, far as I know.

Selina





Current thread: