nanog mailing list archives
Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...)
From: Manar Hussain <manar () ivision co uk>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 1998 01:11:08 +0100
the fact that it requires client authors to adapt to the new format. As someone else commented, client authors have yet to adequately deal with multiple A records, so the hopes of them working in the capability to deal with a completely new RR are small.
Actually I'm not so sure - I can well imagine that a reasonably well publicised change in how DNS works in order to make "the web better" would probably get adopted more readily in browsers than mere conformance to well documented, already existent RFCs that are currently flouted. Manar
Current thread:
- Re: Beyond DNS..., (continued)
- Re: Beyond DNS... Daniel Reed (Jun 04)
- Re: Beyond DNS... black (Jun 05)
- Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...) Studded (Jun 05)
- Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...) Michael Shields (Jun 05)
- Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...) Studded (Jun 05)
- Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...) Stephen Sprunk (Jun 05)
- Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...) Studded (Jun 06)
- Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...) Michael Shields (Jun 07)
- Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...) Daniel Reed (Jun 05)
- Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...) Studded (Jun 05)
- Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...) Manar Hussain (Jun 07)
- Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...) Paul Vixie (Jun 07)
- Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...) Manar Hussain (Jun 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Beyond DNS... Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 04)