Re: Load balancing/Multiple CNAME's (Was: Re: Beyond DNS...)

[shields () crosslink net (Michael Shields)]

In article <357981AD.D7950B99 () san rr com>,
Studded <Studded () san rr com> wrote:
>       In any case, all this does is reinforce Paul Vixie's statement in the
> FAQ that I quoted previously. Basically he said that multiple CNAME's
> are allowed now, but may go away at some point in the future. That
> doesn't mean it's not a valid tool now, especially since there aren't
> any better tools yet. 

It's not wise to deploy more instances of something which is
clearly deprecated.
-- 
Shields, CrossLink.