nanog mailing list archives
Re: MTU of the Internet?
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 1998 12:05:29 -0500
Peter Ford writes:
Several people have noted to the Microsoft Support and Product groups that they want the Windows 95 PPP MTU to be set to 576 (down from 1500). this change is in Windows 98. The reason for this change cited by many customers is that many ISPs have 576 MTUs set "inside" their networks and packets get fragmented.
I know of no modern networking media in common use at ISPs that has an MTU below 1000, and have not heard of ISPs with MTUs that low. Also, the ISP's PPP could simply negotiate the MTU down -- it need not accept a large MTU, no matter what Windows would like. The entire story sounds, to say the least, fishy. BTW, if Windows 95 is doing path MTU discovery, it should all be irrelevant. Perry
Current thread:
- MTU of the Internet? Peter Ford (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Forrest W. Christian (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Tony Torzillo (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Dirk Harms-Merbitz (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Bradley Reynolds (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Dave Siegel (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Forrest W. Christian (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 04)
- Message not available
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jay R. Ashworth (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Tony Li (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Stephen Wolff (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Tony Li (Feb 05)
- Message not available
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 04)