nanog mailing list archives
Re: MTU of the Internet?
From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin () ascend com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 11:13:11 -0800
At 12:18 PM 2/5/98 -0600, Phil Howard wrote:
Marc Slemko writes...First, I _really_ doubt the web server set the DF bit. It is almost certainly the OS, probably trying to do path MTU discovery. If there is a smaller MTU in the middle, and someone is filtering ICMP can't fragment errors then yes, you will have trouble with PTMU discovery. The fix is to not blindly filter ICMP. Increasing the client MTU won't fix this.Agreed that one should not blindly filter ICMP. However not all filter tests don't support discriminating individual ICMP types. Ascend is one example.
Why not? You have the options to use IP filters which are fairly limited, or generic filters where you can specify more details of the filter. Kevin
Current thread:
- Re: MTU of the Internet?, (continued)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 05)
- The 'tude [Was MTU of the Internet?] Steve Carter (Feb 05)
- Re: The 'tude [Was MTU of the Internet?] Perry E. Metzger (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jeff Stehman (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Marc Slemko (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Kevin A. Smith (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Marc Slemko (Feb 04)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? George Swallow (Feb 05)