nanog mailing list archives

RE: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charset=us-ascii


From: Gary Zimmerman <garyz () savvis com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 15:56:22 -0600

This would mean that Worldcom has a very large percentage of the Internet traffic.  Does everyone think they will let 
this go through, without breaking out the Internet part of the deal?  What about selling the InternetMCI portion off to 
someone to keep a balance of carriers of the Internet traffic and not let it be controlled by one company?   I can 
think of few companies that could buy the InternetMCI portion, but do they want in the game?  I would think a few of 
them are forward thinking enough to know what that could mean.  So, who will start the biding,  anyone with 4 or 5 
billion, laying around?  Several....

Gary Zimmerman 

-----Original Message-----
From:   Nathan Stratton [SMTP:nathan () robotics net]
Sent:   Monday, November 10, 1997 4:07 PM
To:     Steve Carter
Cc:     nanog () merit edu
Subject:        Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charset=us-ascii

On Mon, 10 Nov 1997, Steve Carter wrote:

Pessimist Nathan?  I seems to me that it would be out of character for 
Worldcom to integrate MCI.  They didn't with MFS, ANS or UUNet.  Different 
market targets?

-Steve.

I don't think so. They may try different target markets, but the cost
savings of merging the internet networks is very big. Yes it is a good
idea to make MFS and UUNet separate divisions, because they work better
that way. I think you will see MFS + Brooks as one unit and UUNet + ANS +
internetMCI as one unit. 


P.S. In that last messages I said that internetMCI was using Stratacom,
they are actually using Fore.

-Nathan



Current thread: