nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () jain com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 08:24:25 -0400 (EDT)
UUNET would only be interested in paying a farm that they owned! INTERNET - CONTENT = TRANSPORT
Okay, I know someone else is going to do it, so I might as well: How does your above equation make your point (assuming for a fact its even accurate) INTERNET = TRANSPORT + CONTENT INTERNET - TRANSPORT = CONTENT I guess it can equally prove that UUNet should pay for web farms. (this is not an opinion statement, just algebra). If we wanted to get really specific, there is another equation - INTERNET = TRANSPORT + CONSUMERS therefore: TRANSPORT + CONTENT = -(TRANSPORT + CONSUMERS) CONTENT = -CONSUMERS What does that prove? Content has to go somewhere that is, the consumers. -Deepak. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- RE: UUNET Press Release on Peering, (continued)
- RE: UUNET Press Release on Peering Peter Galbavy (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Sean M. Doran (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Sean M. Doran (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mark Prior (May 13)
- RE: UUNET Press Release on Peering James Saker (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Craig Nordin (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Sean Donelan (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Bill Unsworth (May 14)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering William Allen Simpson (May 14)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Ron Buchalski (May 14)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Deepak Jain (May 15)