nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering
From: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals () hotmail com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 20:45:29 PDT
From: "William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson () greendragon com>
[snip]
As it turns out, the inequality is actually in the other direction. UUnet is a consumer, not a provider, requesting the traffic from the web farms. So, it would be the consumers paying the small ISPs, paying UUnet, paying the web farms. UUnet wants it both ways, with them getting paid in the middle....
Of course, if UUNET (and other BB providers) can't make enough money to keep their network in place and their people motivated (and compensated) properly, they'll have no reason to stay in business, and then the server farms will become regional islands anyway. UUNET would only be interested in paying a farm that they owned! INTERNET - CONTENT = TRANSPORT -rb --------------------------------------------------------- Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering, (continued)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Wayne Bouchard (May 13)
- RE: UUNET Press Release on Peering Peter Galbavy (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Sean M. Doran (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Sean M. Doran (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Mark Prior (May 13)
- RE: UUNET Press Release on Peering James Saker (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Craig Nordin (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Sean Donelan (May 13)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Bill Unsworth (May 14)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering William Allen Simpson (May 14)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Ron Buchalski (May 14)
- Re: UUNET Press Release on Peering Deepak Jain (May 15)