nanog mailing list archives

Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements

From: Tony Barber <tonyb () uunet pipex com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 11:23:55 +0000 (GMT)

Vadim Antonov wrote:


2) generally speaking, BGP path length is too blunt an instrument.  More fine-grained
control is needed to allow peers to fine-tune balance of their interests.  I'm
sorry to be too naive, but i'm repeating that for years and nobody seems to agree
that BGP needs real metrics.  How come?


On this point does anyone have any experience of using the cisco DPA implementation
between providers ?

--Tony       
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Current thread:

consistent policy != consistent announcements Randy Bush (Mar 12)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements John W. Stewart III (Mar 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Vadim Antonov (Mar 13)
  - Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Tony Barber (Mar 13)
  - Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Randy Bush (Mar 13)
  - Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Tony Li (Mar 16)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Sean Donelan (Mar 13)
  - Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Randy Bush (Mar 13)
  - Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements John Scudder (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Vince Fuller (Mar 13)
  - Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Henry Kilmer (Mar 13)
    - Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements David Schwartz (Mar 13)
  - Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements the Riz (Mar 13)
- Re: consistent policy != consistent announcements Vince Fuller (Mar 13)

(Thread continues...)