nanog mailing list archives

Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!!


From: Ben Black <black () zen cypher net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 21:50:04 -0400 (EDT)

resorting to petty insults and attacks is indicative of a weak position.  
try again with actual content.

On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Jack Rickard wrote:

No, I don't think you "get it" at all Ben.

jack

----------
From: Ben Black <black () zen cypher net>
To: Jack Rickard <jack.rickard () boardwatch com>
Subject: Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!!
Date: Friday, June 27, 1997 6:58 PM

and we are getting what we pay for, aren't we?

On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Jack Rickard wrote:

We looked at some of the Inverse work.  It appears that it is very
influenced by whomever will pay $50,000 for the full report.  We'll
pass on
this work, and I'll pass on further comment beyond that.


I will say that there will be no $50,000 reports issuing from
Boardwatch
Magazine, Inc.

Jack Rickard

===================================================================
Jack Rickard                                    Boardwatch Magazine
Editor/Publisher                    8500 West Bowles Ave., Ste. 210
jack.rickard () boardwatch com                     Littleton, CO 80123
www.boardwatch.com                             Voice: (303)973-6038
===================================================================


----------
From: Ben Black <black () zen cypher net>
To: Craig A. Huegen <c-huegen () quadrunner com>
Cc: Jack Rickard <jack.rickard () boardwatch com>; Peter Cole
<Peter.Cole () telescan com>; nanog () merit edu; marketing () keynote com
Subject: Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better
test!!!
Date: Friday, June 27, 1997 2:28 PM

for an exmple of somewhat more complete and better designed
benchmarks of

this type:

http://www.inversenet.com/about/backgrounder.html#2

note that they understand the numerous factors that contribute to
overall

performance.  only a marketing droid could think downloading 50k
worth of

web pages is somehow an indicator of overall performance.


b3n




Current thread: