Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!!

["Jack Rickard" <jack.rickard () boardwatch com>]

I'm not a marketing droid.  But only a moron would think that overall
performance would NOT affect the download of a web page, which is
essentially what you are attempting to say.

There are certainly other ways to do it.  Approximately Internet User
Population raised to Internet User Population worth.

Jack RIckard

===================================================================
Jack Rickard                                    Boardwatch Magazine
Editor/Publisher                    8500 West Bowles Ave., Ste. 210
jack.rickard () boardwatch com                     Littleton, CO 80123
www.boardwatch.com                             Voice: (303)973-6038
===================================================================


----------
> From: Ben Black <black () zen cypher net>
> To: Craig A. Huegen <c-huegen () quadrunner com>
> Cc: Jack Rickard <jack.rickard () boardwatch com>; Peter Cole
<Peter.Cole () telescan com>; nanog () merit edu; marketing () keynote com
> Subject: Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!!
> Date: Friday, June 27, 1997 2:28 PM
>
> for an exmple of somewhat more complete and better designed benchmarks of

> this type:
>
> http://www.inversenet.com/about/backgrounder.html#2
>
> note that they understand the numerous factors that contribute to overall

> performance.  only a marketing droid could think downloading 50k worth of

> web pages is somehow an indicator of overall performance.
>
>
> b3n