nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP ... New Information
From: George Herbert <gherbert () crl com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 19:03:07 -0700
Bill writes:
In my humble opinion, its much better to clean up the whole range first and then re-release it as a clean /8, than haphazard redelgation.
As a contractor at a site with a /19 in 192 I would muchly prefer that we not have to renumber for no good reason. I understand garbage collecting small blocks, but there *are* some well-managed, large and clean allocations in 192. -george william herbert gherbert () crl com
Current thread:
- Re: NSP ... New Information Eric Germann (Jun 04)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Phil Howard (Jun 04)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Miguel A.L. Paraz (Jun 05)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Stephen A Misel (Jun 05)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Michael Dillon (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Tung-Hui Hu (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Bill Manning (Jun 08)
- 192/8 (was Re: NSP ... New Information ) Suzanne Woolf (Jun 08)
- Re: 192/8 (was Re: NSP ... New Information ) Matthew Petach (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information George Herbert (Jun 10)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Miguel A.L. Paraz (Jun 05)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Paul A Vixie (Jun 10)
- multihoming without BGP Tung-Hui Hu (Jun 10)
- Re: multihoming without BGP Paul A Vixie (Jun 10)
- Re: multihoming without BGP Robert E. Seastrom (Jun 10)
- Re: multihoming without BGP Dean Gaudet (Jun 11)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Phil Howard (Jun 04)
- Re: NSP ... New Information David Holub (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information David Holub (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: NSP ... New Information Larry Vaden (Jun 08)