nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft Registered Domains
From: Mark Borchers <markb () infi net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 19:42:26 -0400 (EDT)
We recently had a downstream customer of ours tell his customer that it was okay to use our nameservers as his secondary for his domains. About 60 of them. The InterNIC appears to have no clear policy on removing the NS records that point to an unwilling DNS server. At one time I actually sent a message off to questions(?)@internic.net on this issue, but never received a response. Our solution was to provide empty DNS records to prevent lame delegation problems.
This discussion has taken place before. I believe the most creative solution was submitted by a DNS administrator who simply pointed "www" in the unwelcome domain to some disreputable site. Now, shouldn't this discussion be taken to some *other* place?
Current thread:
- Microsoft Registered Domains Robert A. Pickering Jr. (Jul 14)
- Re: Microsoft Registered Domains Michael Shields (Jul 14)
- Re: Microsoft Registered Domains Robert A. Pickering Jr. (Jul 14)
- Re: Microsoft Registered Domains Michael Shields (Jul 14)
- Re: Microsoft Registered Domains Stephen Sprunk (Jul 14)
- Message not available
- Registering domains behind the nameserver ops' backs. Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 14)
- Re: Microsoft Registered Domains Robert A. Pickering Jr. (Jul 14)
- Re: Microsoft Registered Domains Jeffrey Haas (Jul 14)
- Re: Microsoft Registered Domains Mark Borchers (Jul 14)
- Re: Microsoft Registered Domains Michael Shields (Jul 14)