nanog mailing list archives
Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved]
From: Andrew Partan <asp () partan com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 17:26:41 -0400 (EDT)
provider, and we have "summary-only" set in our BGP configuration. Every
Try it w/o the summary-only stuff. I don't use summary-only, or aggregate-address, or network XXX at all. I redis my connected & static routes into bgp and arrange for my global routes to make it beyond my AS. I also use pull up static routes to null0 for all of my blocks. Try it this way & see if it make things more stable. --asp () partan com (Andrew Partan)
Current thread:
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Matthew Kaufman (Jul 11)
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Andrew Partan (Jul 11)
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Dorian R. Kim (Jul 11)
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Chris Garner (Jul 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Matthew Kaufman (Jul 11)
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Craig A. Huegen (Jul 11)
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Phil Howard (Jul 11)
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Craig A. Huegen (Jul 11)
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Danny McPherson (Jul 11)
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Robert Gutierrez (Jul 11)
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Dorian R. Kim (Jul 11)
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Charles Sprickman (Jul 11)
- Re: weird BGP cisco-ism? [problem resolved] Barry A. Dykes (Jul 11)
(Thread continues...)