nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco withdrawal email propogation (was Re: withdrawal propagation)
From: "dave o'leary" <doleary () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 13:00:09 -0800
If people insist on continuing to discuss this (not that I encourage it :-), cisco-nsp () cic net might be more appropriate (yeah, I know Bill, it's critical to the ongoing operations of the Internet and therefore deserves discussion on the nanog list and the public has a right to know blah blah). dave At 11:31 -0800 1/15/97, Alex.Bligh wrote:
Matt Ranney <mjr () wacky eit com> quoted E.E.Times"So, the REAL problem isn't so much with Cisco routers, but with Cisco's router users."... I've discovered this odd problem with Cisco router users who propogate unwanted emails about BGP withdrawals. Whilst they claim there is no harm in doing so, and its not against any group charters, spewing this random information out is real *annoying*. Any chance someone could fix these users so they don't keep spewing out this crap so I can keep my NANOG logs clean please. :-) Alex Bligh Xara Networks
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?), (continued)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) John W. Stewart III (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) John W. Stewart III (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Avi Freedman (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Paul A Vixie (Jan 15)
- Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?) Matt Ranney (Jan 15)
- Cisco withdrawal email propogation (was Re: withdrawal propagation) Alex.Bligh (Jan 15)
- Re: Cisco withdrawal email propogation (was Re: withdrawal propagation) alex (Jan 15)
- Re: Cisco withdrawal email propogation (was Re: withdrawal propagation) dave o'leary (Jan 15)