nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cisco withdrawal email propogation (was Re: withdrawal propagation)


From: alex () relcom EU net
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 97 23:23:37 +0300

It's amazing to read all you. CISCO is not bug free, espesually
in the modes their authors newer think about (16 ASYNC lines loaded
by local ISP at 40Kbit every, with BGP and FAIR QUEUERING, for example; no doubt
everybody can foung his own examples). But I can't found anybody who
have said what's real problem caused by this _withdrawaling_.

  Matt Ranney <mjr () wacky eit com> quoted E.E.Times
  > "So, the REAL problem isn't so much with Cisco routers, but with
  > Cisco's router users."

  ... I've discovered this odd problem with Cisco router users
  who propogate unwanted emails about BGP withdrawals. Whilst
  they claim there is no harm in doing so, and its not against
  any group charters, spewing this random information out is
  real *annoying*. Any chance someone could fix these users
  so they don't keep spewing out this crap so I can keep my
  NANOG logs clean please. :-)

  Alex Bligh
  Xara Networks




--- 
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: