nanog mailing list archives
Re: An end to spam through Graphnet
From: Bill Becker <bbecker () iconn net>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 04:04:56 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 1 Aug 1997, Bill Woodcock wrote:
I noticed that the LocalIP stuff wasn't actually working, but haven't had a chance to check into why yet... Anybody actually seen that one in action?
Did you restart sendmail? If your LocalIP class is a flat file like F{LocalIP} as opposed to a database class like K{LocalIP}, then you have to restart (not kill-hup) sendmail to force the class to be reread. And now back to your regularly scheduled NANOG program. Bill
Current thread:
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Bill Woodcock (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Bill Becker (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Jon Lewis (Aug 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Jon Stevens (Aug 02)
- An end to spam through Graphnet Dana Hudes (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Geoff White (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Matthew White (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Greg A. Woods (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Michael Dillon (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet J.D. Falk (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Jon Lewis (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Keith McCallion (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Geoff White (Aug 02)