nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering versus Transit
From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian () cic net>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 01:48:35 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 29 Sep 1996, Vadim Antonov wrote:
Finally, most IXP operators do not seem to be diligent in explaining to new IXP members to be that being at IXP is by no means a guarantee that anybody would want to peer.
That would be putting it rather mildly. In fact some of the IXP sales droids perpetuate the myth that connecting a _single_ IXP = connectivity to Internet and mislead some poor clueless folks into buying IXP's services. -dorian - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Peering versus Transit, (continued)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Bill Woodcock (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Alan Hannan (Sep 29)
- RE: Peering versus Transit Chris A. Icide (Sep 29)
- RE: Peering versus Transit Chris A. Icide (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Barney Wolff (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Peter Galbavy (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Neil J. McRae (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Alex.Bligh (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Peter Galbavy (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Bill Woodcock (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Dorian R. Kim (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Bill Woodcock (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Sean Doran (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Vadim Antonov (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Bill Woodcock (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Matt Zimmerman (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Jeff Young (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Matthew Kaufman (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Sean Doran (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Barney Wolff (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Dorian R. Kim (Sep 30)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Peering versus Transit Bill Woodcock (Sep 29)