nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ungodly packet loss rates
From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian () cic net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 19:25:46 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 22 Oct 1996, Tony Li wrote:
itself by. For example, the provider has the very nice metric of "trouble tickets per day per billi-packet". This gives him a real gauge of how many problems his network is seeing. If the customer is happy, then the provider must be doing something right...
The only problem with this metric is that under heavy load, it tends to have high packet loss. Which is, of course, where over-engineering comes in... ;) -dorian - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates, (continued)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Mark Boolootian (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates jbash (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Vadim Antonov (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Bill Manning (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Peter Kline (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates jbash (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Tony Li (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Andrew Partan (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Dorian R. Kim (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Tony Li (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Dorian R. Kim (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Tony Li (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Avi Freedman (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates bmanning (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Avi Freedman (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Michael Dillon (Oct 22)