nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ungodly packet loss rates
From: Tony Li <tli () jnx com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 16:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
All an end user is left is a murky feeling that their provider might be broken. Hopefully, along with technical advances, we'll get advances in network measurement area (hopefully IPPM effort of IETF will bear bountiful fruit) so will force providers to the "right thing" or face loss of business. Yes, but the end user need not be the only metric that a provider can gauge itself by. For example, the provider has the very nice metric of "trouble tickets per day per billi-packet". This gives him a real gauge of how many problems his network is seeing. If the customer is happy, then the provider must be doing something right... Tony - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates, (continued)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Robert Laughlin (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Mark Boolootian (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates jbash (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Vadim Antonov (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Bill Manning (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Peter Kline (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates jbash (Oct 21)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Tony Li (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Andrew Partan (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Dorian R. Kim (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Tony Li (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Dorian R. Kim (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Tony Li (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Avi Freedman (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates bmanning (Oct 22)
- Re: Ungodly packet loss rates Avi Freedman (Oct 22)