nanog mailing list archives
Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 22:12:41 -0400
Herr Manning, At 11:15 AM 10/11/96 -0700, bmanning () ISI EDU wrote:
You mean that routing protocols need to take account of policies? ;-) Or do you mean that BGP isn't good enough? Michael Dillon - ISP & Internet ConsultingYes... (silly :) Yes... (serious) BGP has a number of serious flaws. The more complex the routing mesh, the more they will become visable. And if what I see is correct, IDRP, the BGP heir, has the same sets of problems.
Another suggestion? Lacking one, one might suggest that the complexity of the 'mesh' needs to be simplified. - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Vadim Antonov (Oct 10)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Alan Hannan (Oct 10)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II bmanning (Oct 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Vadim Antonov (Oct 10)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Alan Hannan (Oct 11)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Stephen Wolff (Oct 11)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II maillists (Oct 11)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II William Allen Simpson (Oct 11)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Vadim Antonov (Oct 11)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Paul Ferguson (Oct 12)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Bill Manning (Oct 12)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II John G. Scudder (Oct 12)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II bmanning (Oct 14)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II John G. Scudder (Oct 14)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Havard . Eidnes (Oct 14)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Curtis Villamizar (Oct 14)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Paul Ferguson (Oct 12)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II William Allen Simpson (Oct 13)
- Re: Intra/Inter - was Inet-II Paul Ferguson (Oct 14)