nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]y
From: Jerry Scharf <scharf () vix com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 11:57:27 -0800
The gigaswitches do port filtering, I believe that was agreed to be the better choice.
Given that all the FDDI based interconnects have shared rings as well as dedicated ports, port filtering is not a general solution. Jerry - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Paul Ferguson (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Avi Freedman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Deepak Jain (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Jon Zeeff (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]y Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]y Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]yy Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy]y Jerry Scharf (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Deepak Jain (Oct 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Dima Volodin (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert Bowman (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Jonathan Heiliger (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Tony Li (Oct 30)
- Re: Bit-dumping [Was: Re: Peering Policy] Alex.Bligh (Oct 31)