nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX )
From: Scott Huddle <huddle () mci net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 14:49:37 -0500
Michael Dillon <michael () memra com> wrote
On Wed, 30 Oct 1996, Scott Huddle wrote:Applying lets say 1 cent per 100 bit charge, AAA gets $455.64 from BBBSo here is my question -- why is this kind of arrangement not being used anywhere???The bookkeeping costs $2000 per month for *BOTH* providers to monitor this, collect data, collect bills, etc....Source of data, please?Same source as the other guy's data. I pulled it out of thin air. Actually, I figured $2,000 per month would be an appropriate salary for one clerk to handle this job. And the point was that managing settlements costs money. We know that in the POTS system the costs of usage based billing are at least 50% of the total.
OK, do you have a source for the POTs number? -scott - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Owen DeLong (Oct 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Scott Huddle (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Michael Dillon (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) alex (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Michael Dillon (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Scott Huddle (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Michael Dillon (Oct 30)
- Re: Peering Policy ( was Re: AGIS/DIGEX ) Scott Huddle (Oct 30)