nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 21:41:16 -0500
Hey, this looks pretty good. Let's hope the trend continues (if, in fact, there *is* a trend). - paul At 12:00 PM 11/29/96 -0800, Tony Bates wrote:
Date Prefixes 231196 40687 241196 40908 251196 40844 261196 41043 271196 41074 281196 39803 291196 39735
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: 192/3 ? (The CIDR Report), (continued)
- Re: 192/3 ? (The CIDR Report) alex (Nov 17)
- Re: The Cidr Report Scott Huddle (Nov 15)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 15)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 15)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 15)
- The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 22)
- Re: The Cidr Report Steve Kann (Nov 22)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 23)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Nov 23)
- Re: The Cidr Report William Allen Simpson (Nov 23)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Bates (Nov 26)
- Re: The Cidr Report Paul Ferguson (Nov 29)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Li (Nov 29)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Nov 30)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Nov 30)
- Re: The Cidr Report Bill Manning (Nov 30)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Li (Nov 29)
- Re: The Cidr Report Tony Li (Nov 29)