nanog mailing list archives
Re: topological closeness....
From: dgaudet () hotwired com (Dean Gaudet)
Date: 18 May 1996 19:25:13 GMT
In article <QQapom01899.199605132105 () rodan UU NET>, Mike O'Dell <mo () uunet uu net> wrote:
one other solution (being implemented, I believe), is a DNS server that listens to the BGP traffic, so it knows how far away things are,
Another option is to take advantage of the timing information DNS already keeps track of: $ORIGIN foobar.com. www IN NS www1 www IN NS www2 www IN NS www3 Each of those nameservers is actually the webserver... and responds only with the A record for itself. Turn down the TTL. Let DNS caching take care of the rest... It doesn't work because, as far as I've seen, the clients (ok, netscape) doesn't ever requery the DNS. I'm not sure what state they're at now -- but they're moving towards doing all the resolver work themselves so as to get multithreaded behaviour. Maybe we can convince the browser writers to use ttl. Dean - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- topological closeness.... Mike O'Dell (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Dean Gaudet (May 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: topological closeness.... Vadim Antonov (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Randy Bush (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Mike O'Dell (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Paul A Vixie (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Mike Trest (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Geoff Huston (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... George Herbert (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Michael Dillon (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Sanjay Dani (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Matt Zimmerman (May 13)
(Thread continues...)