nanog mailing list archives
Re: topological closeness....
From: gih () aarnet edu au (Geoff Huston)
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 10:09:44 +1000
At 6:15 PM 13/5/96, Vadim Antonov wrote:
Cacheing appears to be the only sane way to distribute load. You always know where the closest cacheing server is.
not even this is the case - you can guess but that may not always work! If I could _enforce_ caching by traffic interception then I could construct vaguely logical cache structures as an ISP. But relying on users to configure their end systems with the identity of the closest cache server using some ill defined "network metric" is always going to be an erratic affair at best. geoff - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- topological closeness.... Mike O'Dell (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Dean Gaudet (May 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: topological closeness.... Vadim Antonov (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Randy Bush (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Mike O'Dell (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Paul A Vixie (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Mike Trest (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Geoff Huston (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... George Herbert (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Michael Dillon (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Sanjay Dani (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Matt Zimmerman (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... David R. Conrad (May 15)
- Re: topological closeness.... Vadim Antonov (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Michael Dillon (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Vadim Antonov (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Vadim Antonov (May 13)
- Re: topological closeness.... Jon Zeeff (May 13)
(Thread continues...)