nanog mailing list archives
Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16
From: Sean Donelan <SEAN () SDG DRA COM>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 14:35:58 -0500 (CDT)
i am still trying to understand why this is causing so much of a problem, possibly masking a second bug. but i would appreciate knowing how widespread the leakage is.
Yep, that one looks familar. I reported it to trouble () mci net last October when I was setting up a MBONE tunnel with MCI. In the end it was easier to just filter those MCI internal networks on my side. My guess is it leaks across anyone talking to MCI with as-in: ANY, who doesn't agressively filter. I think this one falls into the catagory, trust, but verify. -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Affiliation given for identification not representation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Ron Stear (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Rob Gutierrez (Jun 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Peter Lothberg (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Sean Donelan (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Eric Kozowski (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Ron Stear (Jun 08)