nanog mailing list archives
Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16
From: randy () psg com (Randy Bush)
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 96 11:19 PDT
*> 204.70.128.0/21 144.228.43.17 1000 0 1792 1239 3561 4292 i this one itself is interesting o 4292 should not be announcing it in the first place o 3561 should not believe it from 4292 as it is an internal 3561 route o and his satanic majesty's filters should not have let it in 1239/1792 because of prefix length is it one of those new stealth prefixes? randy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Ron Stear (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Rob Gutierrez (Jun 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Peter Lothberg (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Sean Donelan (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Randy Bush (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Eric Kozowski (Jun 08)
- Re: leakage of specifics of 204.70.0.0/16 Ron Stear (Jun 08)