nanog mailing list archives
Re: InfoWorld Column on Netcom-Cisco Ampersand Collapse
From: Sean Doran <smd () icp net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 13:44:38 +0100
| Ever your fan and loyal opposition, The only thing you seem to fan is flames. Why don't you write something useful, like why is it that outage reporting is so spotty, and why is it that people don't seem willing to share technical details of outages such that other technical folks can learn from mistakes and disasters? I can tell you why outage () sprint net isn't what it used to be: journalists and PR folks would turn detailed technical reports of the scope, cause, and cure for our outages into columns dedicated to bashing cisco, Sprint, or both. There is a disease on the Internet, and that disease is "us and them"ism. You are well-placed to help cure that disease, yet right now you are one of its biggest transmission vectors, Bob, and it's a huge pity. Sean. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- InfoWorld Column on Netcom-Cisco Ampersand Collapse Bob Metcalfe (Jul 09)
- Re: InfoWorld Column on Netcom-Cisco Ampersand Collapse Craig A. Huegen (Jul 09)
- Re: InfoWorld Column on Netcom-Cisco Ampersand Collapse Michael Dillon (Jul 09)
- Re: InfoWorld Column on Netcom-Cisco Ampersand Collapse Perry E. Metzger (Jul 09)
- Re: InfoWorld Column on Netcom-Cisco Ampersand Collapse Per Gregers Bilse (Jul 09)
- Re: InfoWorld Column on Netcom-Cisco Ampersand Collapse Barry Shein (Jul 09)
- Re: InfoWorld Column on Netcom-Cisco Ampersand Collapse Ehud Gavron (Jul 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: InfoWorld Column on Netcom-Cisco Ampersand Collapse Sean Doran (Jul 09)
- Re: InfoWorld Column on Netcom-Cisco Ampersand Collapse Craig A. Huegen (Jul 09)