nanog mailing list archives

Re: Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's.


From: Ehud Gavron <GAVRON () ACES COM>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 11:47:28 -0700 (MST)


As I recall, at some point Internic was handing out subnets
of old class B space and reserving the remaining subnets for the same
organisation. If that's the case here then, 164.103.0.0/16
should be advertised sprintlink instead of 164.103.3.0/24.

        Nice thought, except it doesn't work in practice.  
        We have 169.197.0/18.  When we advertise it, Sean's
        filters prevent ICM/ICP from getting it.  When we 
        mis-advertise it as /16 the filter lets us through.

        My two messages to INSC, 2 to engineer@sl, and 4 to Sean
        didn't generate any solutions, so what makes you think
        it will work for 164.103.3.0/24?
        
 
      --Ismat

        Ehud


Current thread: