nanog mailing list archives
Re: Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's.
From: Ismat Pasha <ipasha () ulysses sprintlink net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 12:44:08 -0500 (EST)
As I recall, at some point Internic was handing out subnets of old class B space and reserving the remaining subnets for the same organisation. If that's the case here then, 164.103.0.0/16 should be advertised sprintlink instead of 164.103.3.0/24. --Ismat On Tue, 30 Jan 1996, Peter Lothberg wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 17:50:09 +0000 From: William griffin <wgriffin () mci net> To: insc () sprintlink net Cc: trouble () mci net, pp000314 () interamp com Subject: route not being advertised We have a customer with the following address: 164.103.3.0/24 and it seems that you are not accepting our advertising of it. Could you please adv. -- The darkness illuminates the light. William Griffin Network Engineer wgriffin () mci net (800)977-4662
Current thread:
- Re: Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's. Paul Ferguson (Jan 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's. postel (Jan 30)
- Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's. Peter Lothberg (Jan 30)
- Re: Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's. Ismat Pasha (Jan 30)
- Re: Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's. Ehud Gavron (Jan 30)
- Re: Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's. Ismat Pasha (Jan 30)
- Re: Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's. Brett D. Watson (Jan 30)
- Re: Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's. Brett D. Watson (Jan 30)