nanog mailing list archives
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
From: huitema () pax inria fr (Christian Huitema)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 10:40:34 +0100
At 11:22 AM 26/1/96, Sean Doran wrote:
| > We just have some differences of philosophy -- you think | > that RIPE really can persuade people into having only | > 1024 announements (preferably far fewer) in 195/8, and | > I don't. That's all. | | OK. I call this a challenge but you won't let me try ;-). You and Randy Bush seem to be reading each other's minds. He has proposed this in a way that is very interesting, and which I will think about. There is a bad failure mode to consider that even a badge afterwards won't make any more attractive. Mostly it's "what on earth do we do if we cross the threshold of 1024 prefixes in 195/8?" to which I see no easy answer that doesn't involve inflict enormous pain on people with old, established long prefixes in 195/8.
There is at least one very simple response. Set up some deviant CIX, say IX195-8, let everyone with a shortish 195/8 prefix connect to it either directly through their own provider, or indirectly through some tunnel, and have IX195-8 announce reachability of 195/8. That is, in short, altern topology to meet addresses when the converse is too hard. KRE detailed that for the general case, but it would be even simpler in the case of RIPE, since all the allocated network numbers are in the same geographical area. Christian Huitema
Current thread:
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations, (continued)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations @NANOG-LIST (Jan 28)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Kim Hubbard (Jan 28)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Robert A. Rosenberg (Jan 28)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Robert A. Rosenberg (Jan 28)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Kim Hubbard (Jan 28)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Sean Donelan (Jan 28)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Dick St.Peters (Jan 28)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Michael Dillon (Jan 29)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Dick St.Peters (Jan 28)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Christian Huitema (Jan 29)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Peter Galbavy (Jan 29)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Christian Huitema (Jan 29)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Ed Morin (Jan 29)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Christian Nielsen (Jan 29)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations George Herbert (Jan 29)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Dave Siegel (Jan 29)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations George Herbert (Jan 29)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Ed Morin (Jan 29)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations bmanning (Jan 30)
- Chiappa blows his brains out (was Re: Policy Statement) Joel M Snyder, writing fool (Jan 29)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Curtis Villamizar (Jan 30)