nanog mailing list archives
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
From: jon () branch com (Jon Zeeff)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 13:21:08 -0500 (EST)
Another factoid to consider - I know of a company that has a Class C that they don't use. To my knowledge, nobody has ever even asked that they give it up. Some automated email process could do this without much effort.Well, almost. The IPGR robot is, in fact, doing just that.
Based on never having received such an email and knowing of several others who haven't either, I disagree.
Current thread:
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Noel Chiappa (Jan 31)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations George Herbert (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Curtis Villamizar (Jan 31)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 01)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Bill Manning (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Michael Dillon (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Curtis Villamizar (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations bmanning (Feb 02)
- Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations Jon Zeeff (Feb 01)