nanog mailing list archives
Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG
From: salo () msc edu (Tim Salo)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 15:29:22 -0600 (CST)
To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Date: Wed, 04 Dec 1996 12:48:15 -0800 From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>That's fixed by having multiple note-takers.Yes, that is certainly one approach. Then the issue becomes collecting information from presenters and note-takers to build the on-line meeting notes.I don't agree. The issue remains: if multiple note-takers are available, why isn't someone stepping forward to help out with the *current* work?
Sounds like a good proposal opportunity. [I wonder if there is a funding source other than the U.S. Federal Government that would be receptive to such a proposal.] -tjs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Creation of working groups within NANOG Paul Ferguson (Dec 03)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Arun Welch (Dec 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Stan Barber (Dec 03)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Arun Welch (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Derek Elder (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Arun Welch (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Stan Barber (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Paul A Vixie (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Paul Ferguson (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Tim Salo (Dec 04)
- Re: Creation of working groups within NANOG Stan Barber (Dec 04)