nanog mailing list archives
Re: Would the list object...
From: David Miller <david () sparks net>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 21:17:46 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 2 Dec 1996, Paul Ferguson wrote:
I personally don't object, per se, but I dropped off the inet-access list earlier this year due to the unbearably low signal/noise ratio. If the NANOG list were to become a cacophony as did inet-access, you can scratch this list too. I figure that if anyone on inet-access is interested in the discussion(s) here on NANOG, then they are already subscribed.
Let me guess: Last spring during the CDA rants with Karl going full bore? Yup, I logged off it too for a while. It's better now, few messages, more signal. But the s/n is still a fraction of nanog:( Still, as someone on the steep side of the learning curve I'd love to have hyper-access to the things this list has covered. --- David ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's *amazing* what one can accomplish when one doesn't know what one can't do! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Would the list object... David Carmean (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Would the list object... Paul Ferguson (Dec 02)
- Re: Would the list object... Michael Dillon (Dec 02)
- Re: Would the list object... David Miller (Dec 02)
- Re: Would the list object... Michael Dillon (Dec 02)