Re: Would the list object...

[Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>]

I personally don't object, per se, but I dropped off the inet-access list
earlier this year due to the unbearably low signal/noise ratio. If the
NANOG list were to become a cacophony as did inet-access, you can scratch
this list too.

I figure that if anyone on inet-access is interested in the discussion(s)
here on NANOG, then they are already subscribed.

$.02,

- paul

At 11:16 PM 12/1/96 -0800, David Carmean wrote:

> I've started expanding the last couple years of the archives of 
> this list back into hypertext (Hypermail at the moment) so I could 
> review some of the threads that are more than a couple of months old.
>
> If I get the OK for the resources from "The Management", would any (many?)
> of you object to me making the existence of my unofficial mirror 
> known to inet-access, etc.?  I have some concerns that it might 
> precipitate off-topic noise on this list, but I also think that it 
> would be a good resource for those on the steep portion of the 
> learning curve to understand why things are the way they are, e.g 
> route filtering, peering restrictions, etc....
>
> Thanks
>
> -- 
> David Carmean                                           <dlc () silcom com>
> Silicon Beach Communications, Santa Barbara, California  +1-805-730-7740
>  Opinions herein are those of the author only, unless otherwise noted

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -