nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 1996 19:46:53 -0500
At 04:26 PM 4/2/96 -0800, Michael Dillon wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 1996, Curtis Villamizar wrote:If the providers were to relax the requirements to renumber when moving to another provider or when dual homing, the problem of the TWD would not be growing at its current rate.Hmmm.... ISP has T1 to SPRINT, wants to switch to MCI, SPRINT says, OK you have a choice, either renumber or pay us to route your traffic to MCI via a private exchange point so we don't have to knock holes in our aggregate. That way you can use SPRINT's addresses and MCI's T1, but for a fee.
And the global routing table grows. - paul
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role, (continued)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Michael Dillon (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Curtis Villamizar (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Jon Zeeff (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Michael Dillon (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role John Curran (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Stan Barber (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role @NANOG-LIST (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Tim Salo (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Ehud Gavron (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Bradley J. Passwaters (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Paul Ferguson (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Michael Dillon (Apr 02)
- Sprint's agenda Jon Zeeff (Apr 03)
- Re: Sprint's agenda Christopher E. Stefan (Apr 07)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Curtis Villamizar (Apr 03)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Paul Ferguson (Apr 02)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Hank Nussbacher (Apr 03)
- RE: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Jim Fleming (Apr 03)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Paul Ferguson (Apr 03)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Michael Dillon (Apr 03)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Paul A Vixie (Apr 03)
- Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role Michael Dillon (Apr 03)
(Thread continues...)