Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role

[jon () branch com (Jon Zeeff)]

> it has) and a viable alternative is presented, I suspect Sprint will
> be interested in cooperating in the best interest of the Internet, and
> at least give any new ideas an objective audience.

We have a request in to Sprint to make an exception to their policy.  
We will renumber, resulting in a reduced number of route 
annoucements.  I'd like to think that what you say is correct - we'll 
see.