nanog mailing list archives
RE: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role)
From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming () unety net>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 11:50:39 -0600
On Saturday, April 06, 1996 2:23 AM, Avi Freedman[SMTP:freedman () netaxs com] wrote: @> As part of the educational effort you might want to add information about @> IPng (IPv6) as well as RFC 1918...this may help to give people hope... @ @Until there's an operational plan for simplifying routing by using IPng, @I think we'll avoid mentioning it since it begs the question "If we can't @route 2^32 addresses..." @ @> Jim Fleming @ @Avi @ Yes...that is why we are coding as fast as we can on C+@nIP (or IPv8)...:-) -- Jim Fleming UNETY Systems, Inc. Naperville, IL 60563 e-mail: JimFleming () unety net
Current thread:
- Re: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Paul Ferguson (Apr 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Jim Fleming (Apr 05)
- Re: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
- RE: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Paul Ferguson (Apr 06)
- RE: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Jim Fleming (Apr 06)
- RE: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Jim Fleming (Apr 06)
- Re: "Not see IPv6 in your lifetime"????? Mike O'Dell (Apr 06)