nanog mailing list archives
Re: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role)
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () netaxs com>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 08:23:41 -0500 (EST)
As part of the educational effort you might want to add information about IPng (IPv6) as well as RFC 1918...this may help to give people hope...
Until there's an operational plan for simplifying routing by using IPng, I think we'll avoid mentioning it since it begs the question "If we can't route 2^32 addresses..."
Jim Fleming
Avi
Current thread:
- Re: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Paul Ferguson (Apr 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Jim Fleming (Apr 05)
- Re: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Avi Freedman (Apr 06)
- RE: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Paul Ferguson (Apr 06)
- RE: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Jim Fleming (Apr 06)
- RE: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role) Jim Fleming (Apr 06)
- Re: "Not see IPv6 in your lifetime"????? Mike O'Dell (Apr 06)