nanog mailing list archives
Re: Links on the blink - reprise
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 19:52:12 -0500
At 05:45 PM 11/17/95 -0700, Dave Siegel wrote:
One of the reasons why end users find frame-relay undesireable is that they cannot be assured that their provider is not grossly oversubscribed on PVC-per-port density. When you buy a T1 private line, you can be assured that you're not sharing it with 120 other end-users. :-)Nor can you know that with a Dedicated line, that the other side doesn't feed into a 2501 into a collision-ridden Boca 10baseT hub, into a Welfleet bridging over Frame-Relay-over-ATM at 1.5Mbps simplex speeds into an over-committed 4Mbps port speed on the other side. i.e., the fact that your buying a leased line to connect and running HDLC over it doesn't count for anything. When it comes right down to it, customers can't really be reassured of anything.
Quite true. Appearances can be deceiving. :-) I was just reiterating (what I thought to be) the obvious.
But then, nobody expects the customer to realize this, right? Dave
Um, I won't touch this one. - paul
Current thread:
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise, (continued)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Simon Poole (Nov 17)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Marten Terpstra (Nov 21)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Paul Ferguson (Nov 17)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Ehud Gavron (Nov 17)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Nathan Stratton (Nov 18)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Alan Hannan (Nov 18)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Nathan Stratton (Nov 18)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Ehud Gavron (Nov 17)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Dave Siegel (Nov 17)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Curtis Villamizar (Nov 17)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Mike O'Dell (Nov 18)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise Curtis Villamizar (Nov 20)
- Re: Links on the blink - reprise - Nov 6th issue, etc.... Mike O'Dell (Nov 18)