nanog mailing list archives
Re: US Domain -- County Delegations
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 14:56:22 -0700
if we do a mapping/hashing thing, we'll do it in the root servers in a way that the clients will not even have to see. solving the ".COM is full" problem from the point of view of the root servers won't require any kind of protocol or user visible change.
Current thread:
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations bmanning (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Walter O. Haas (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 02)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Ross Veach (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Randy Bush (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations George Herbert (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Ferguson (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations bmanning (Aug 02)