nanog mailing list archives
Re: US Domain -- County Delegations
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 17:11:33 -0700
Curtis, You're right that customers can't recompile and many can't or won't reinstall a new name server or anything else. Like I said, this kind of hashing stuff either has to be completely user visible, or it has to be a fiction maintained (and hidden) by the root servers. I've received a request to move this discussion to some non-nanog list, which isn't unreasonable. I've about said my piece anyway. Meet me on bigz if you have more to say.
Current thread:
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations, (continued)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations bmanning (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Walter O. Haas (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 02)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Ross Veach (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Traina (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Randy Bush (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Curtis Villamizar (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul A Vixie (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations George Herbert (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Paul Ferguson (Aug 01)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations bmanning (Aug 02)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations bmanning (Aug 02)
- Re: US Domain -- County Delegations Owen DeLong (Aug 02)