nanog mailing list archives
Re: wiretapping continues....
From: mak () aads net (Mark Knopper)
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 1994 12:02:19 -0400
At 9:48 AM 10/27/94, Martin L. Schoffstall wrote:
Merit/NSFNet already tackled these issues in an insufficent and unopen manner. MarkFedor/ColeLibby from PSI said there was a "quiet" admission that the old methodology was already "approved" for the SPRINT NAP. Marty
Since it is not possible or desirable for NAP providers to collect statistics on IP source/destination pairs, protocol types, or per-NSP datagram counts, it seems that a different mechanism would be needed to do engineering analyses to manage Internet performance and growth. The NSFNET mechanism which used a device at each regional DMZ (nnstat or equivalent) seemed like a good mechanism to do that, especially given the research/education focus of the regionals. I suggest that it would be very difficult to do this sort of monitoring on commercial networks. Why not continue the NSFNET sponsored and approved method of placing collectors at NSF-supported regional network DMZs even after the NSFNET transition, so that we have at least a sampling of Internet traffic measurements. Mark - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- wiretapping continues.... Martin L. Schoffstall (Oct 27)
- Re: wiretapping continues.... Bilal Chinoy (Oct 27)
- Re: wiretapping continues.... Matt Mathis (Oct 27)
- Re: wiretapping continues.... Peter S. Ford (Oct 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: wiretapping continues.... Vadim Antonov (Oct 27)
- Re: wiretapping continues.... Mark Knopper (Oct 28)
- Re: wiretapping continues.... John Scudder (Oct 28)
- Re: wiretapping continues.... Mark Knopper (Oct 28)
- Re: wiretapping continues.... John Scudder (Oct 28)
- Re: wiretapping continues.... George H. Clapp (Oct 31)
- Re: wiretapping continues.... Curtis Villamizar (Oct 31)
- Re: wiretapping continues.... Vadim Antonov (Oct 31)